On the basis of several answers in the
surveys, undertaken by the sociologist Ottar Hellevik, he divides the
Norwegian population into four categories, which in the 1980s were roughly of
the same size. We have the modern materialists. They are oriented towards
short-time consumption, they are enthusiastic about new technology (always
first with the new cell phone), they have little sense of tradition, and they
put their own welfare and interests first. Secondly, we have the modern idealists,
representing equality between the sexes, anti-authoritarianism, caring, tolerance
and individual self-realization. Then there are the traditional materialists,
focusing upon material security and economic growth, but much more culturally
conventional and traditional than the modern materialists. Hellevik’s last
category is the traditional idealists, committed to patriotism and traditional
values, often including respect for the Christian heritage.
This is a blog of my Scandinavian adventures. Being fascinated by its culture, literature and art for a long time, I have moved first to Denmark, and then to Norway, to experience and live it all. The blog will follow my insights into Scandinavian education, culture, people, language. I will try and cover positives, as well as negatives, as to provide a deeper explanation of my experiences and adventures. I will also try to trace Scandinavian routes outside its current territorial borders.
Labels
Aalborg
(3)
Architecture
(4)
Århus
(2)
Culture
(18)
Denmark
(12)
Design
(8)
Education
(9)
Finland
(2)
History
(3)
Iceland
(1)
Inspiration
(14)
København
(7)
Literature
(2)
Music
(2)
Nature
(8)
Northern Russia
(4)
Norway
(15)
Research
(2)
Scandinavia
(22)
Society
(1)
Vikings/Varangians
(1)
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
Hellevik's sociological classifications. Towards egalitarianism, or is it at all possible?
As most four-fold tables in sociology,
these categories are ideal types, pedagogical caricatures. But Hellevik shows
from his rich data material that a surprisingly large part of the Norwegian
population fits into one of the four categories without too much friction. I am
not a strong believer in data, as we don’t know who exactly was questioned and
how answers fit with reality, but there is some sense in this. Don’t you recognize
some of your friends/acquaintances that could fit into one or another category?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment